自分の好きなモノ – My Favorite things -

0



先端統合デザイン特論Ⅰ

「『自分の好きなモノ』を配置し、説明するためのパネルを制作せよ。」

Ustream

先端統合デザイン特論Ⅰの課題を提出しました。

デザイン・サッカー・バイク・音楽・映画・禅・ファッション・アップル・思い出
とパネルを作成する過程で自分が好きなモノを考えたのですが、結構あっさりと「自分」という結論に至りました。

自分勝手な性格は自覚しているつもりですが、自分が好きな事はいい事だと思っています。なぜなら、一度しかない人生を他人に羨望したまま送るのは余りに自分がかわいそうだと考えるからです。
日本人は自分をそれほど好きではない人が多いように思います。今日の授業でのプレゼンテーションでも、発表できる人数が決まっていたので博士後期課程まで進んだ自分は遠慮するべきだと考えていたのですが、手を挙げる人がおらず、周りの意志を確認しても立候補が出なかったので、諦めていたプレゼンのチャンスをもらうことが出来ました。
目立つことが恥ずかしい事なのでしょうか。自分自身にかっこつけるために頑張れるくらいでないとダメでしょう。
僕は鍛錬を重ね、精進を続け、自分を向上させて行きたい。
I made a presentation panel for assignment of Prof. Kazuo Kawasaki’s lecture, “Lay out what you like on presentation panel.”
Design・Soccer・Motorbike・Music・Movie・Zen・Fashion・Apple・Good Memory
I thought out many kinds of my favorite things in the course of making the panel. However, not long I got a conclusion that it was “Me”.
I know my selfishness but I think it’s good to love oneself. It’s because we should not live other’s life for others but live our life for ourselves.
I wonder Japanese don’t seem to love oneself. There is no students candidate except PiD_Lab. Appealing is something to shame? It’s better to work hard for oneself.
I want to train me and make me higher.

W杯メンバー発表にみるリーダーシップ – What is Leadership? -

0
本日、2010年南アフリカW杯の日本代表メンバー23人が岡田武史代表監督から選出されました。
＜GK＞
楢崎正剛（３４）＝名古屋
川島永嗣（２７）＝川崎
川口能活（３４）＝磐田
＜DF＞
中沢佑二（３２）＝横浜マ
田中マルクス闘莉王（２９）＝名古屋
駒野友一（２８）＝磐田
岩政大樹（２８）＝鹿島
今野泰幸（２７）＝ＦＣ東京
長友佑都（２３）＝ＦＣ東京
内田篤人（２２）＝鹿島

＜MF＞
中村俊輔（３１）＝横浜マ
稲本潤一（３０）＝川崎
遠藤保仁（３０）＝ガ大阪
中村憲剛（２９）＝川崎
阿部勇樹（２８）＝浦和
松井大輔（２８）＝グルノーブル
長谷部誠（２６）＝ウォルフスブルク
本田圭佑（２３）＝ＣＳＫＡモスクワ

＜FW＞
玉田圭司（３０）＝名古屋
大久保嘉人（２７）＝神戸
矢野貴章（２６）＝新潟
岡崎慎司（２４）＝清水
森本貴幸（２２）＝カターニア
メンバー選出には、どんな国・どんな時代でも選ばれる選手と選ばれない選手がおり、それを決めるのは責任を負った代表監督であるので、ああだこうだと言うのは意味が無いと思っています。
なので、メンバー選出については何の文句も言わないけれど、岡田監督の目標については多いに疑問を感じたので、そのことについてここで書きます。
「何でベスト４なん？」と。
はっきり言って、今までの成績や現在の実力を他国と比較すれば、それが難しい目標である事は誰でも分かる。
でも、例えそれが滑稽だとしても、指揮官ははっきりと「優勝する！」と言わなければならないのではないか？

はたして「負け戦をしにいくぞー！」という将軍に、兵士は士気を上げてついて行けるのだろうか。

難しい目標を掲げるなら、なぜいっそ一番上を狙わないのだろう。日本人の慎ましさに多いに疑問を感じずにはいられない。

日本代表チームには、スタッフ・選手を含めて全員が一丸となって戦い、あくまで優勝を目指して一試合でも多く勝って欲しい！そう強く思います。

Today, 23 members of Japanese National team for 2010 World cup were selected by the coach of the team, Takeshi Okada.

There is no meaning to complain about his choice, because the coach of national team has all responsibility about it.

Therefore, I don’t have a bone to pick with him about selection of members but I felt the doubt very much about his target.

“Why is your target Best 4?”
We know it’s very difficult by comparing Japan with other countries, however I think a leader must say clearly “We will be No.1″ no matter how comical it is. I can’t help wondering about Japanese over humility.
I want Japanese National Soccer Team to work together with staffs and members and win a lot even by one game as possible as they can aiming for the trophy.

勝間和代 VS ひろゆき からネット匿名実名論議を考える – Real name or Anonimity on Internet -

0
今、ネット上で話題になっている 勝間和代 VS ひろゆき （BSジャパン『デキビジ』にて放送。残念ながらYouTubeの動画は削除されてしまったようです。）を見て多くの方が自分の意見を述べているので、僕も自分の意見を述べたいと思います。
二人の間でのディベートだけをとれば、実名派の勝間さんが終止議論に論理性を欠いていて残念な感じだったけれど、僕はネット実名派です。（前の投稿にも書きましたが。）
理由はネットと現実社会とそれぞれの活動を総合して自分自身を世間に評価してもらいたいからです。アノニマスなまま人生を終えるのはイヤダ！と常々思っているので、責任を持って発言し、世間に認められて行きたいと願っています。
自分自身がそう思っているだけなので、他の人がどうしようがあまり気になりません。論理的な批判ではない誹謗中傷などはスルー出来るようにならないとと思ってます。
だからこの論議の結論としては、「匿名・実名それぞれのメリットとデメリットを認識して個々人が選択すべき」と言うことになるんじゃないかと。多分大事なのは「選択」が出来るということであって、ネット環境を変えようと思ったらモラルやリテラシーを育てるしかないんかなと考えます。規制で縛ってもどうせ失敗するんやし。
僕がこういう考えを持つに至ったのは、大企業に受かったある友人が大企業そのものを自慢してきた時に感じた気持ち悪さに起因しています。
「それってスゴいのは、お前じゃないやろ？」
この時以来、どうやって自分が目立つかを考えるようになりました。目立つ方が、敵も多く作って大変なのは分かっているけれど、自分がどうやって生きたいかをブレさせたらアカンと自戒しています。
I try to state my own opinion about that which people should chose real name or anonymity , since many people state their own opinion through the debate about it between Ms.Kazuyo Katsuma(a famous economic analyst) and Mr.Hiroyuki(former owner of Japanese largest Bulletin Board on Internet).
In their debate, Ms.Katsuma who support realnamism lost her logic and elicited sympathy from viewer but I choose real name side. (I wrote on my older post.)
It’s because I want to be evaluated by the sum of real me and virtual me (It’s mean my activity on Internet). I hope to be not an anonymous one and to become a responsible one so I’m interested in not other’s activity but myself. I think “The individual should select it recognizing advantages and disadvantage of anonymous and real name.” If I want to change commonsense in Internet, I guess it is the best way to grow people’s moral or literacy of Internet.
My creeps to anonymous began when I heard from my friend his brag about his company.
“The wonderful thing is not you.”
I have thought how to appeal myself since the time. I know if I make much more opponents, I feel more stress. The most important thing is how I want to live.

The dignity of the professor

0
Today I met and talked with two professors. One is the president of Osaka University and the other is not special one. First I asked the president about a fault of Center for the Study of Communication-Design which Osaka University built some years before. It had a good anticipation for success from many people but it couldn’t get a result they expected. I think the fault was caused by misdirection of the president because he didn’t assign our Professor of the older chairman of Good Design award as a director of the center. I wanted only easy explanation about the reason he dislike our Prof. However, he faltered to say clear things and at last he said like that “I can’t do almost things, so I want young students to make something.”
On the other hand, I met to thank one professor I owe a lot. When I gave appreciative words to him, he simply said like that “I didn’t nothing. You do everything.”, he did many messy works for selfish me though.
I felt the dignity of the professor from this episode regardless their position.

ECO or EGO

0
I think reducing CO2 is no need but reducing number of using fossil fuel is needed. It’s because we have to take a notice to more essential problem than invalid global warming issues.
In the same way, stopping killing kinds of whales is no need but keeping the ecological system safe is needed. It’s because we have to remember we are the member of the ecological system. It means we must not protect specific animals except some endangered species caused by human. I feel this idea criticize the capitalism and human’s ego.

Energy Revolution

0
I believe that while in existing technologies, only atomic energy can produce Energy Revolution. It’s because not that it need to reduce producing CO2 but that the resource of thermal power generation is already limited so we have to seek much more resource than fossil fuel. Surely, there are many dangerous elements left in controlling atomic energy, but they are our task for starting new generation. At all I think that reducing CO2 is no need, truly what we have to do is reducing waste of limited resource.

Relationship between humans and animals

0
I want to consider a relationship between humans and animals following last article. Basically I think it is only a relation whether eat or eaten as a living thing. Even more for human of eating everything, it is natural. I guess, in savannah if a human and a lion meet, the man would be killed and eaten soon. Therefore, I look down on vegetarians who say that animals are poor and terrorists who protest that whales should not be caught because they are wise than other animals. If there are not religious idea, socially-accepted idea and law, even we can’t predict its appearance. Therefore, I think it is important for us to eat everything with thanking them.

Commercial Films recent I hate.

0
Do you know these commercial films? I like the beautiful girl appeared on the CFs, but I hate them because of theirs contents. In the movies, talking animals criticize the human and human behavior according to environmental problems. They talk over and look down on from the high place. Is the civilization evil? Although the producer of these movies might intend to arouse viewer’s interests about environment, I felt they are like problems of religious viewpoint. Nonetheless to develop the civilization means invade animals except pets, I feel it is ridiculous to get along with them by civilization. Therefore, I hate them according to the inconsiderateness of scriptwriters. I don’t want to tell that their energy devices were bad, I think energy innovation must be needed for human not animals by atomic energy.

Replace Human

0
Robot will be able to conquer the human, but I think robot can’t replace the human. It’s because we never know why we live. Therefore, I think complete AI can’t be made, it’s mean they won’t do philosophical thinking and believe religion. After all, there are little demand of humanoid robot, so mechanoid robot will become the dominator or job robber for human in the near future..

The last of the Astro Boy

0
Do you know the Astro Boy? He may be the most famous Robot in Japan. He is a fictional robot in Manga written by the God of Manga, Osamu Tezuka. He wrote many many Manga before he’d gone, they are still shining and impressive for me. “The last of the Astro Boy” is one of his short story. This story is very gloomy, so it is distinctly different from normal Astro Boy’s story. In this story, human kill each other for fun of robot. This depiction is very realistic so I thought it would be. Our work will get robbed by robot and Robot will conquer the human…